To the editor:
Vanderbilt has admitted to being financially and
personally involved with a company, Emergent Asset Management (EAM),
which is hiding behind a façade of “sustainable agriculture.” In
reality, what they are doing is exploiting some of the world’s poorest
people and their last possessions — their only remaining land.
We
know through the Oakland Institute’s on-the-ground research and EAM’s
own corporate statements that they are buying up massive acreages of
land in Southern African countries and converting it into industrial
agriculture operations by coercing communities with force and threats,
exploiting workers by not paying them and planning on driving continued
speculation. The Vanderbilt Office of Investments, which manages our
collective endowment fund, has rejected these claims but has yet to
publicly respond.
When I talk to people, sometimes the reaction
is that this is far-fetched. This could never happen, right? The fact
is, I myself have been to Guatemala while doing linguistics research, a
place where U.S.-backed corporations have had an undisputed,
well-documented history of doing exactly this in the past, similarly
under the guise of “creating jobs in underdeveloped areas” — and then
this escalated in the wholesale genocide of the peasants who refused to
remain silent.
Disturbingly, EAM’s subsidiaries are based in South
Africa, the former home of apartheid. Mozambique, one EAM’s main
agro-sites, is the home of a large peasant group UNAC that recently
produced a report supporting the fact that these land grabs are not
isolated occurrences. These aren’t far-fetched tales, but the facts of
our reality.
I see two major problems here. The first is the very
real possibility that we, Vanderbilt, are profiting from people in
Africa losing their land and food in ways that violate any sensible
notion of human rights. I love Vanderbilt, and I know it does good in
the world here, but I don’t want our goodwill to be predicated upon
human rights abuses in other countries.
The second problem is
that, if Vanderbilt has some evidence that contradicts the documentation
I’ve seen, why haven’t I seen that? Why isn’t it public? You and I have
as great a claim to how this money is used as anyone else. It’s
unacceptable that no one has any method of fact checking or holding our
administration accountable for its actions. Remember the Vanderbilt
Community Creed? Three of those principles were Caring, Honesty, and
Accountability. I want our endowment to follow this creed as much as we
ourselves are held to it.
And with these principles and facts in
mind, I am publically reiterating the coalition Vanderbilt Campaign for
Fair Food’s requests, that Vanderbilt University immediately divest from
EAM, write a public letter apologizing to the individuals and
communities affected and implement serious endowment transparency and
public ethical measures.
We are students, faculty and others
allied against these ongoing unsustainable practices. In that spirit,
I’d like to invite you (faculty too!) to attend a short organizing
session and teach-in regarding these land grabs and what you can do to
change policy held by the coalition; it will be in Buttrick 101 at 8
p.m. on Wednesday, Nov. 9. Mark your calendars, and I’ll see you there!
----
Zach Blume
College of Arts and Science
Class of 2014
Member of Vanderbilt Campaign for Fair Food
Nashville, Tennessee USA
Inside Vandy
To ease your site search, article categories are at bottom of page.
November 03, 2011
Land grabs contradict Vanderbilt University's values
Categories commercial farming, investment